-
-
wil6ka · · Reply
Guadelupe (Mexico #19)
www.lomography.com/homes/wil6ka/albums/2460789-guadelupe-me… -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
stevejack0 · · Replywww.lomography.com/homes/stevejack0/photos/27380993?order=r…
Lomo or not or doesn't matter?
-
-dakota- · · Replywww.lomography.com/photos/27359063 I love the lo-fi effect of the Holga.The blurriness and vignetting are dreamy, just as the camera claimed.I've never had light leaks though!
-
-dakota- · · Reply
www.lomography.com/photos/27359076
Velvia 50 has always been one of my favorite films for xpro. This one expired 10 years ago, but it worked well! -
-
-
-
steamtug1959 · · Reply
Our community is fantastic because there are many specialties in photography. Analog photography is becoming less and less common, and we should stay united instead of dividing...
-
steamtug1959 · · Reply
Chef in a restaurant: "I like your Photos - you must have a good Camera." Helmut Newton (after the Meal): "The Food was excellent - you definitely have good Pots."
-
steamtug1959 · · Reply
Lomography has evolved (Petzval, Lensbaby, Neptune, etc.), and good Photos have nothing to do with the Price of the Camera. Days ago I entered Lomo-Camera-Photos that prove this..
-
-
zorki · · ReplyEnjoy your stay in Osaka @mackiechartres! I hope you'll take a lot of great pictures there🙂
-
mackiechartres · · Replyno uploads today for me today, and for the next 2 coming weeks, I am about to fly to Osaka, I'll be back in July ! take care !
-
mackiechartres · · Reply
thanks for the links 👍 and whatever your skills and techniques are, I really dig your uploads folks, @stevejack0 @stereograph @schwarzesauge @steamtug1959 @zorki and so on...
-
-
zorki · · Reply
@schwarzesauge: I found two old notes from 2014. They might be interesting for context:
-
stevejack0 · · Reply
Looks pretty lomo but because i used an expensive camera it isn't? www.lomography.com/homes/stevejack0/photos/27375940?order=r…
-
-
stevejack0 · · Reply
@stereograph WTF are you on about! So I have to leave this site because you don't like my boring photos?
-
stereograph · · Reply@stevejack0 you think this look at your photos, perfect boringness with a 5000$ Camera.
this is lomo not flickR!
Deal: buy a Holga and show me what you can, let's meet at hignnoon on mainstreet! -
stevejack0 · · Reply
@stereograph No one thinks analogue is the same as lomo photography but it isn't chalk and cheese. It's more like cheese and yoghurt and luckily I'm not dairy/analogue intolerant, so I'm eating it all
-
schwarzesauge · · ReplyI guess there is more than one answer. The mindset itself, the overall culture, the economcs, .. I don't know. But at least we can continue taking imperfect, strange, crazy & blurry photos ;-)
-
schwarzesauge · · Reply
But, of course, I agree with @stereograph It has to do a lot with the mindset. The question is why people are less willing to make experiments, to make mistakes and lucky mistakes?
-
-
schwarzesauge · · Reply
not true for beginners. when you only start dipping your feet into the lomo-water, things like the prices for film, for camera, for develpoment cann be quite important. and if the first results are
-
schwarzesauge · · Reply
@mackiechartres @stereograph this is maybe true for you and me. I'm shooting for quite a long time. It is something that is somehow important for me. So it also ok to spend money. but this is maybe
-
mackiechartres · · Reply
as a personal conclusion : as I already said, every camera (and every film) is worth using it. and we are all different here, boredom only arises from uniformity !
-
mackiechartres · · Reply
@stereograph Yes, Lomography & photography are not exactly the same - I noticed it when "serious" amateurs made fun of me about it (not here, eh) - but I don't care. I like to practice both.
-
mackiechartres · · Reply
want to save money? shoot b&w, develop it yourself, and there you go. also consider buying expired color. or home rolled kodak vision3. i buy those at 7$.
-
mackiechartres · · Reply
i don't consider myself as an artist, but the price I have to pay for films and cams is part of what i do. i do not have the choice. and that said, i take photos & publish them almost every day.
-
mackiechartres · · Reply
@schwarzesauge @zorki I agree wit @stereograph about the cost. Yes, its is expensive, but so are other hobbys, imo. I heard to guys today discussing about the price of playing tennis...
-
stereograph · · Reply
... many people thing that lomo & analogue photoraphy are the same, and that's wrong!
To produce pristine photos from textbook with analogue methods is just anachronism but not lomo or lo-fi! -
stereograph · · Reply
@schwarzesauge If you let money come in the way of your creativty, you're out! It kills the process.
imo the problem is that due to the revival of analogue photography ... -
zorki · · Reply
Thank you for your comments @schwarzesauge. I would also say the current problem is the expensive film prices. Understandably nobody wants to waste a 25 € Fuji Provia 100 in a 5 € thrift store camera.
-
-
schwarzesauge · · Reply
@stereograph you don't wanna waste it. As a result you make less experiments and think twice before taking a photo. The result: Less chaotic, less vibrant lomography....
-
schwarzesauge · · Reply
@stereograph to come back to the original discussion: I think the problem is on the other side. Films are getting far more expensive. So, specially as a starter with energy but not that much money,
-
-
stereograph · · Reply
@stevejack0 Oh, you mean you're the guy that was banned on flickR, for bitching around. i understand!
